Rome—The United States military has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to train soldiers and fighters in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan and in all cases, the programs were failures.
In 2014, the Iraqi army lost Mosul, the country’s second largest city in a matter of days. In Afghanistan, government troops are losing ground to the Taliban. In Syria, the Pentagon recently gave up trying to train so-called moderate militias as reports that some units were totally ineffective and others were funneling weapons to radical Islamic groups.
The Iraqi and Afghan military failures span the Bush and Obama administrations, while the Syria fiasco is all on Obama. Is it the fault of the teachers or the students or the mission itself?
In Syria, Obama acknowledged that the problem was that the American-favored militias, if interested in fighting at all, were more eager to battle the forces of President Bashar al-Assad than the Islamic State. And why not? For Sunni Muslim Syrians, Assad is the big enemy.
This problem goes back at least as far as the Vietnam War, and ought to lead to a rethinking of how, why and how much the US spends to train foreign troops that simply may not want to fight.
The fault is corruption and political ineptitude in Iraq.
Maybe the US is just not good at it.